Is Wolf Blitzer a traitor?  hmmmmmm  (Assassination attempt on Tim Turner)
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread584697/pg1

I sent this out the other day and want to send it again as it is what the following blog is all about.  ...cal

JMP: Tim Turner Republic Update  1:56
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kB36UVnaNFQ&feature=related

http://www.nevadaappeal.com/article/20100402/NEWS/100409959/1070&ParentProfile=1058
Excerpt:
I am sure that you are all dedicated to reporting your local news with absolute honesty and that you endeavor to inform your readers of the truth of what is happening in the world around them. Assuming this is true, I feel it necessary to give you some more information about what is really happening with your state capitol.

Please understand that the title of the article, "Capitol locked down in wake of threats" is inaccurate in precise representation of the truth. It is true that the capitol was locked down because of "letters" sent to the governor. However, the "letter" received by all 50 governors is actually a Declaration from a lawful Grand Jury of 26 people in each state which is endeavoring to re-establish the true Republic in a peaceful and lawful manner.

http://www.republicofiowa.org/downloads/Restored-America-Our-Plan-And-History.pdf
Restore and reinhabit the de jure institutions of lawful government.



End the foreclosure nightmare (for borrowing against one’s own credit).



End tax prosecutions for resisting the transfer of private wealth to such as I.R.S. (former Puerto Rico Bureau of Taxation).



End street assaults against the sovereign People for failing to exhibit a State-issued confession of subject-class citizenship.



End all prosecutions which lack an injured party.



corporate State under a contrived corporate color-of-law venue (corp. ref. 27 C.F.R. 72.11).

End admiralty prosecutions for kidnapping and other heinous crimes against mankind as “commercial crimes” against the



which confess the signer to be a legal fiction subject of the United States Federal Corporation (“U.S. person”) that has waved

his/her rights in favor of state-issued privileges.

End the use of covert contracts such as Form 1040, car registrations, birth certificate applications, and bank signature cards



County registrars and tax assessors.

End the use of deeds which classify the People as “tenants” on their own land, thereby transferring control to incorporated



whereby incorporated “courts” presume the “right” to trespass on families and kidnap children.

End the perversion of marriage into a commercial system of state-issued privileges through the so-called “marriage license”



ownership for the state-issued “privileges” of “driving” and “title.”

End the hijacking of automobile ownership through DMV registrations which covertly exchange the divine rights of travel and



passage throughout the world free from corporate State molestation and terror.

In place of all of the above, substitute sovereign identification, diplomatic immunity and sovereign passports to facilitate safe



Restore the People’s money and wealth from the banking institutions, war profiteers, and international loan sharks.



paper on, or debts against, the sovereign People, directly or through its agencies and licensed banking institutions.

Instantly vest all mortgages, auto loans and personal business loans “issued” by members of the Fed. The state shall hold no



Instantly end all non-consensual and unlawful taxation including all taxes on the sacred rights of labor and privacy.



Empower and inspire the sovereign People to righteousness through such renewed abundance.



Issue orders to the military and police powers to enforce the Peoples’ divine rights of birth.



End the perverse act of requiring the People to pray to “courts” as is now required under corporate rules and traditions.



Restore the de jure judicial institutions including the district court of the United States and the one supreme Court.



subterfuge without provoking alarm, controversy or armed conflict.

Quietly mirror the strategies of 1933 thereby using their (our) institutions, military and public officials to undo eighty years of



Forgive all corporate actors who repent for their State-sponsored crimes against mankind. Remove the recidivists from office.



provocative actions against a general public that is mostly unaware of the hijacking of their free de jure American republics, and

their hapless media.

Do all of the above, and more, peacefully, discreetly, quietly and honorably, behind the scenes, without public proclamations or

To join the Republic, complete the form “Join the Republic Now” at http://www.republicofiowa.org/

http://www.republicofiowa.org/history.html

page 1

History

The United States exists in two forms:

1. The original United States that was in operation until 1860; a collection of sovereign Republics in the union. Under the original

Constitution the States controlled the Federal Government; the Federal Government did not control the States and had very little

authority.

2. The original United States has been usurped by a separate and different UNITED STATES formed in 1871, which only controls the

District of Columbia and it’s territories, and which is actually a corporation (the UNITED STATES CORPORATION) that acts as our

current government. The United States Corporation operates under Corporate/Commercial/Public Law rather than Common/Private

Law.

The original Constitution was never removed; it has simply been dormant since 1871. It is still intact to this day. This fact was made clear

by Supreme Court Justice Marshall Harlan (Downes v. Bidwell, 182, U.S. 244 1901) by giving the following dissenting opinion: “Two

national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress

outside and Independently of that Instrument.”

The Restore America Plan reclaimed the De Jure institutions of government of the 50 State Republics in order to restore Common Law

that represents the voice of the people and ends Corporate Law that ignores the voice of the people while operating under

Maritime/Admiralty/International Law. This occurred when warrants were delivered to all 50 Governors on March 30, 2010.

The rewritten Constitution of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION bypasses the original Constitution for the United States of

America, which explains why our Congressmen and Senators don’t abide by it, and the President can write Executive Orders to do

whatever he/she wants. They are following corporate laws that completely strip sovereigns of their God given unalienable rights.

Corporate/Commercial/Public Law is not sovereign (private), as it is an agreement between two or more parties under contract. Common

Law (which sovereigns operate under) is not Commercial Law; it is personal and private.

To understand this document, you need to understand some basic terms. Visit www.usavsus.info for complete understanding. The basic

terms are:

De Jure – Existing by right or according to law; original, lawful. Common Law operates under De Jure terms.

De Facto - In practice but not necessarily ordained by law; in fact, in reality. Corporate Law operates under De Facto terms.

Sovereign – A real person. Sovereigns can own property while Citizens/Subjects cannot. According to the original Constitution, all

government comes from the Sovereign Individual. Without the Sovereign Individual, there is no government.

U.S. Citizen/Subject – A corporate fictitious entity that merely represents the real person. It acts as a “strawman.” [To call oneself a

“sovereign citizen” or “sovereign subject” is an oxymoron, since “sovereign” and “citizen/subject” are mutually exclusive of each other.]

When asked if you are a “U.S. Citizen” on corporate legal documents, if you check “yes,” you agree to the terms of Corporate Law and

unknowingly relinquish your sovereign status and transfer all of your rights to the UNITED STATES CORPORATION since you are

now under contract.

Corporation – A non-human, fictitious entity. Corporate fictitious entities are denoted in all caps. This includes the names of

Citizens/Subjects. Your fictitious “strawman” entity is addressed in all caps, i.e. JOHN SMITH, rather than John Smith.

Common Law – God’s law. Common Law and the system of De Jure Juries apply to sovereigns in disputes. In Common Law, contracts

must be entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally.

Admiralty/Maritime Law/International Law – The King’s law. Deals with criminal acts that only apply to international contracts. Under

this law, the people are no longer sovereign. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) that the United States practices is based on Admiralty

Law. Under the UCC, contracts do not have to be entered into knowingly. Simple agreements can be binding, and as long as you exercise

the benefits of that "agreement," you must meet the obligations associated with those benefits. If you accept the benefit offered by the

government, then you MUST follow, to the letter,

each and every statute involved with that benefit. That “benefit” is the Federal Reserve Notes (U.S. dollars). By paying for things with

U.S. dollars you are unknowingly giving up all of your Constitutional rights and are legally obligated to follow all of the UCC statues. But

you were NEVER told this.

Lawful – A term used in Common Law.

Legal – A term used in the UCC which applies to Corporate Law.

http://www.republicofiowa.org/history.html

page 2

HOW THE CONSTITUTION WAS USURPED BY THE CORPORATION

(note by Panama Legal: These are the basic premises adhered to by the people in the movement and the people in the Sovereign

movement. The Government is a Corporation actually functioning as the Federal Government. Thus it does not have to follow the

constitution. Also it does not matter if Obama is not a natural born citizen since it is a corporation he is the head of. The corporation gets

the permission of the people to reign over them by deceit. This is done by wording in the Birth Certificates, Social Security Cards, driving

Licenses, IRS forms, Marriage Licenses and other documents. They always refer to the “person” in all capital letters. This means the

name represents a corporate entity. This is how the corporation courts get jurisdiction over you. Their courts do not fly the “real”

American flag. They use the military or admiralty flag. For a discourse on this try this website: http://www.usavsus.info/

What the theory is goes like this. When you enter a US Courtroom there is a military or admiralty flag flying. The US Military does not

have the protection of the constitution, neither does this apply to admiralty laws with ships at sea. When you enter a court room and cross

through that little wooden gate they have and go to the area where the plaintiff (prosecutor) and defendant sit along with judge, court

reporter, you are entering a “ship” or a foreign country as evidenced by the admiralty or military flag flying thus the constitution has no

applicability and you are under equity law not common law. The flaw with their scheme is that there is no full disclosure to the people

about any of this. This is brief over simplified synopsis of the scam run by the federal corporation. End of our comment.)

In 1788 (January 1), The United States was officially bankrupt.

In 1790 (August 4), Article One of the U.S. Statutes at Large, pages 138-178, abolished the States of the Republic and created Federal

Districts. In the same year, the former States of the Republic reorganized as Corporations and their legislatures wrote new State

Constitutions, absent defined boundaries, which they presented to the people of each state for a vote...the new State Constitutions

fraudulently made the people “Citizens” of the new Corporate States. A Citizen is also defined as a “corporate fiction."

In 1845, Congress passed legislation that would ultimately allow Common Law to be usurped by Admiralty Law.

www.barefootsworld.net/admiralty.html explains this change. The yellow fringe placed at the bottom of court flags shows this is still true.

Before 1845, Americans were considered sovereign individuals who governed themselves under Common Law.

In 1860 – Congress was adjourned Sine Die – Lincoln could not legally reconvene Congress.

In 1861, President Lincoln declared a National Emergency and Martial Law, which gave the President unprecedented powers and

removed it from the other branches. This has NEVER been reversed.

In 1863, the Lieber Code was established taking away your property and your rights.

From 1864-1867, Several Reconstruction Acts were passed forcing the states to ratify the 14th Amendment, which made everyone slaves.

In 1865, the capital was moved to Washington, D.C., a separate country – not a part of the United States of America.

In 1871, The United States became a Corporation with a new constitution and a new corporate government, and the original constitutional

government was vacated to become dormant, but it was never terminated. The new constitution had to be ratified by the people according

to the original constitution, but it never was. The whole process occurred behind closed doors. The people are the source of financing for

this new government.

In 1917, the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) was passed. This insightful video from [link to movielocker.com/4084)] states the

following: “This act was implemented to deal with the countries we were at war with during World War I. It gave the President and the

Alien Property Custodian the right to seize the assets of the people included in this act and if they wanted to do business in this country

they could apply for a license to do so. By 1921, the Federal Reserve Bank (the trustee for the Alien Property Custodian) held over

$700,000,000 in trust.” Understand that this trust was based on our assets, not theirs.

In 1933, 48 Stat 1, of the TWEA was amended to include the United States Person because they wanted to take our gold away. Executive

Order 6102 was created to make it illegal for a U.S. Citizen to own gold. In order for the Government to take our gold away and violate

our Constitutional rights, we were reclassified as ENEMY COMBATANTS.”

In 1933, there was a second United States bankruptcy. In the first bankruptcy the United States collateralized all public lands. In the 1933

bankruptcy, the U.S. government collateralized the private lands of the people (a lien) – they borrowed money against our private lands.

They were then mortgaged. That is why we pay property taxes.

From a speech in Congress in The Bankruptcy of the United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993, Vol. 33, page H-1303,

Speaker Representative James Trafficant Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House states:

“...It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933,

48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June

5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United

States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the

United States Federal Government exists today in name only.

http://www.republicofiowa.org/history.html

The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International

Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under

Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have

adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established

Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the

Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R.

13955 reads in part: “The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States...

Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens of mortgages until the Federal Reserve

Act (1913) “Hypothecated” all property within the Federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, in which the

Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. Citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a “beneficiary” of the trust via his/her birth

certificate. In 1933, the Federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets, and labor of their “subjects,”

the 14th Amendment U.S. Citizen to the Federal Reserve System. In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal

United States Corporation all of the credit “money substitute” it needed.

Like any debtor, the Federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan.

Since the Federal United States didn’t have any assets, they assigned the private property of their “economic slaves,” the U.S. Citizens, as

collateral against the federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks, forests, birth certificates, and

nonprofit organizations as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.

Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common

people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own

property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the People have exchanged one master for another.”

In 1944, Washington D.C. was deeded to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) by the Breton Woods Agreement. The IMF is made up

of wealthy people that own most of the banking industries of the world. It is an organized group of bankers that have taken control of

most governments of the world so the bankers run the world. Congress, the IRS, and the President work for the IMF. The IRS is not a

U.S. government agency. It is an agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law

94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)

page 3

HOW CAN WE REPAIR OUR COUNTRY RIGHT NOW?

“The Supreme Court has said the De Jure Government offices still exist but the people have failed to occupy them.

Remember Downs v. Bidwell and the dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan? He said that two national governments exist; one to

be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions. This is one that We the people need to force our elected public officials to

occupy – De Jure rule.

We need to change that by organizing Grand Juries and putting our officials back under De jure rule and out of the Corporate (or Military)

Rule that they are currently operating under.

Our elected officials will then have to operate under the limits of their Oath of office to uphold the U.S. and State Constitutions, circa

1860. When they violate the Oath it’s a capital crime.

The reason we go back to 1860 is because that is the last time we had lawful laws in this country.

Where do the people get their power to convene a Grand Jury? The Magna Carta, 1215.

Our Founding Fathers looked back to history for precedent when they decided they wanted to change their government. What they found

was the Magna Carta Liberatum, the Great Charter of Freedoms. It set a precedent that changed the face of England forever, by

establishing that the King was not above the law.

King John of England signed the Magna Carta after immense pressure from the Church and his barons (the people). The King often lived

above the law, violating both Feudal and Common Law, and was heavily criticized for his foreign policy and actions in England. The

Barons, with the support of the Church, pressured King John to spell out a list of their rights and guarantee that those rights would be

enforced. The Barons provided a draft, and after some negotiation, King John put his seal to the Magna Carta in Runnymede, in June of

1215.

Section 61 set rules for establishing the Grand Jury. It states: Since we have granted all these things for God, for the better ordering of our

kingdom, and to allay the discord that has arisen between us and our barons (people), and since we desire that they shall be enjoyed in

their entirety, with lasting strength, forever, we give and grant to the barons the following security: The barons shall elect twenty-five of

their number to keep, and cause to be observed with all their might, the peace and liberties granted and confirmed to them by this charter.

If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the

peace or of this security, and the offense is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us.”

The following url is the one used in above ribbon document (Taxes Evidence/US Gov. Denies IRS is part of the governement) 
http://web.archive.org/web/20021204164803/http://familyguardian.tzo.com/Subjects/Taxes/Evidence/USGovDeniesIRS/USGovDeniesIRS.htm
Excerpt:
The following images are scanned copies of pleadings (certified by NARA) wherein a United States Attorney and a United States Department of Justice Trial Attorney, Tax Division, deny that Internal Revenue Service is an agency of the United States Government. 
See specifically page 2 of pleadings, item no. 4.
The allegation by Diversified Metal Products, Inc., Plaintiff, for item number 4 reads,  "Defendant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is an agency of the United States government which has presented to Plaintiff a lien against monies to which Defendant Steve Morgan, or persumably[sic] Defendant T-Bow Company Trust for him, may be entitled." 

Excerpt:
4) Denies that the Internal Revenue Service is an agency of the United States Government but admits the United States of America would be a proper party to this action.
Admits that the United States of America would be a proper party to this action.  Admits that the IRS has served Notice of Levy on plaintiff for funds owed to defendant Steve Morgan owed to tdefendant Steve Morgan.

5)  Admits that the IRS has made a demand on plaintif for payment of funds owed to Steve Morgan.  The United States is without informatio or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations, and, on that basis, denies the remaining allegations.

6)  Admits that Exhibit A and B are attached and are respectively a copy of a letter from Lonnie Crockett and a copy of a Notice of Levy served by the IRS.

7)  The United States is without information or knowledge sufficient to form belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 7 and, on that basis, denies the allegations.

http://usa-the-republic.com/revenue/who%20and%20what%20is%20the%20irs.html
Excerpt:
The Richardson correction above verifies that the Internal Revenue Service is not an agency of United States Government, but the United States of America, clearly a distinct and different entity, would be a party of interest. It would be difficult to be any clearer on the subject, and the Rechardson correction tells us that people such as U.S. Attorneys, attorneys in the Department of Justice, and Federal judges are fully aware of the difference.
Michael Bufkin, a Dundee, Illinois attorney, undertook a delightful project. On December 18, 1998, he sent a Freedom of Information Act request to the Department of the Treasury asking for documentation of authority for the Department of Justice to defend Internal Revenue Service personnel in civil or criminal cases. In an August 2, 1999 response, Leslie Howard in the national IRS office responded with the following: "A search was performed with the Office of Tax Crimes (Criminal Investigation) and with the Assistant Chief Counsel (Disclosure Litigation) and we have no documents responsible to your request. However, you may forward a copy of your request to the U.S. Attorney General's Office within the Department of Justice."
Bufkin did just that. In response to his September 21, 1999 FOIA to the Attorney General, Thomas J. McIntrye informed Bufkin that, "We have conducted a search of the appropriate indices to Criminal Division records and did not locate any records responsive to your request."
We don't know who has lawful authority to defend IRS personnel, but the Department of Justice and U.S. Attorneys don't. Possibly the foreign "United States of America" that is principal of interest and benefits from IRS initiatives has a raft of attorneys ready to defend these foreign agents.
As chance would have it, one of the people in our group recently received certification of documents on IRS Austin Region stationary that is headed, "United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service". The certification letters are dated November 16, 1999.
What we are dealing with amounts to invasion of a foreign government accommodated by our respective State governments. However, thanks to the diligence of people approaching IRS tyranny from several directions, we about have the whole nut documented and broken down.
Dan Meador - Ponca City, Oklahoma

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/cudahy-ca/TLHAG2T9A8K13J4SI/p55
Excerpt:

Dec 29, 2010

We‟re watching, and we need you to watch with us. We have to be more than political spectators when it comes to changing the corrupt culture of government across our cities. Vanguardians is committed to supporting and empowering you and thousands of other conscientious citizens with the tools and information necessary to responsibly demand better government.
I am writing to ask for your support through a year-end financial gift to help us move forward with a robust agenda for 2011 to:
 Restore the long-term financial health of our cities in a fair and honest way;  Protect taxpayers from unwarranted financial burdens;  Highlight the impact on individual lives when government works for
politicians and not the people; and  Provide residents with basic and crucial government-backed services in an
efficient, transparent and affordable manner.  Provide voter education materials and programs.
Asking the Hard Questions
Through deep journalistic investigations Vanguardians will ask provocative questions, investigate the quality of ...................

http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=106508,00.html
Excerpt:
Anti-Tax Law Evasion Schemes - Law and Arguments (Section V)
 
V. Fictional Legal Bases
A. Contention: The Internal Revenue Service is not an agency of the United States.
Some argue that the Internal Revenue Service is not an agency of the United States but rather a private corporation, because it was not created by positive law (i.e., an act of Congress) and that, therefore, the IRS does not have the authority to enforce the Internal Revenue Code.
The Law: There is a host of constitutional and statutory authority establishing that the Internal Revenue Service is an agency of the United States. The U.S. Supreme Court stated in Donaldson v. United States, 400 U.S. 517, 534 (1971), "[w]e bear in mind that the Internal Revenue Service is organized to carry out the broad responsibilities of the Secretary of the Treasury under § 7801(a) of the 1954 Code for the administration and enforcement of the internal revenue laws."
Pursuant to section 7801, the Secretary of Treasury has full authority to administer and enforce the internal revenue laws and has the power to create an agency to enforce such laws. Based upon this, the Internal Revenue Service was created. Thus, the Internal Revenue Service is a body established by "positive law" because it was created through a congressionally mandated power. Moreover, section 7803(a)  explicitly provides that there shall be a Commissioner of Internal Revenue who shall administer and supervise the execution and application of the internal revenue laws.
Relevant Case Law:
Salman v. Dept. of Treasury, 899 F. Supp. 471 (D. Nev. 1995) - The court described Salman's contention that the Internal Revenue Service is not a government agency of the United States as wholly frivolous and dismissed his claim with prejudice.
Young v. I.R.S., 596 F. Supp. 141 (N.D. Ind. 1984) - The court granted summary judgment in favor of the government, rejecting Young's claim that the Internal Revenue Service is a private corporation, rather than a government agency.

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm
Excerpt:

31 Questions and Answers about

the Internal Revenue Service

Revision 3.7

certified by

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Citizen of Washington State, Federal Witness,

Private Attorney General, Author and

Webmaster of the Supreme Law Library

Internet URL of home page:

http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm

Internet URL of this file:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm

Common Law Copyright

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

1.      Is the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury?

Answer:  No.  The IRS is not an organization within the United States Department of the Treasury.  The U.S. Department of the Treasury was organized by statutes now codified in Title 31 of the United States Code, abbreviated “31 U.S.C.”  The only mention of the IRS anywhere in 31 U.S.C. §§ 301‑313 is an authorization for the President to appoint an Assistant General Counsel in the U.S. Department of the Treasury to be the Chief Counsel for the IRS.  See 31 U.S.C. 301(f)(2).

At footnote 23 in the case of Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that no organic Act for the IRS could be found, after they searched for such an Act all the way back to the Civil War, which ended in the year 1865 A.D.  The Guarantee Clause in the U.S. Constitution guarantees the Rule of Law to all Americans (we are to be governed by Law and not by arbitrary bureaucrats).  See Article IV, Section 4.  Since there was no organic Act creating it, IRS is not a lawful organization.

2.      If not an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury, then what exactly is the IRS?

Answer:  The IRS appears to be a collection agency working for foreign banks and operating out of Puerto Rico under color of the Federal Alcohol Administration (“FAA”).  But the FAA was promptly declared unconstitutional inside the 50 States by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of U.S. v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 (1935), because Prohibition had already been repealed.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/29188293/Diversified-Metal-Products-Inc-vs-T-Bow-Company-Trust-Internal-Revenue-Services-and-Steve-Morgan

Excerpt:
Diversified-Metal-Products-Inc-vs-T-Bow Company-Trust-Internal-Revenue-Services-and Steve-Morgan

4) Defendant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is an agency of the United States government which has presented to Plaintiff a lien against monies to which Defendant Steve Morgan or presumably Defendant T-Bow Company Trust for him may be entitled.

5) Defendant IRS&T-Bow Company Trust, for defeidant Steven Morgan have made demand of Plaintiff for payment.

6) Attached here to as Exhibit "A" and "B" are, respectively, the demands for payment by T-Bow Company Trust, by its trustee, threatening suit against Plaintiff and Notice of Levy files by defendant IRS.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downes_v._Bidwell
Downes v. Bidwell wikipedia
Excerpt:
Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided whether United States territories were subject to the provisions and protections of the United States Constitution. This question is sometimes stated as "does the Constitution follow the flag?". The resulting decision narrowly held that the U.S. Constitution did not necessarily apply to territories. Instead, the United States Congress had jurisdiction to create law within territories in certain circumstances, particularly dealing with revenue, that would not be allowed by the U.S. Constitution for proper states within the union. It has become known as one of the "Insular Cases".

Contents [hide] 1 Background 2 Decision 3 Consequences 4 References

[edit] Background

The case specifically concerned a merchant, Samuel Downes, who owned S. B. Downes & Company. His company had imported oranges into the port of New York from the newly acquired territory of Puerto Rico and had been forced to pay import duties on them. He sued George R. Bidwell, United States customs inspector for the port of New York, on the grounds that, as a United States territory, such duties were under the jurisdiction of Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, which provides that "all duties, imposts, and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States." Since the duty on oranges did not exist for other parts of the United States, he argued that it should not exist for Puerto Rico.

[edit] Decision

The U.S. Supreme Court decided, in a five to four decision, that newly annexed territories were not properly part of the United States for purposes of the U.S. Constitution in the matter of revenues, administrative matter, and the like. However, the court was careful to note that the Constitutional guarantees of a citizen's rights of liberty and property were applicable to all: such guarantees "... cannot be under any circumstances transcended ..." said Justice Edward Douglass White in his concurring opinion. Territories were only due the full protections of the Constitution when the U.S. Congress had incorporated them as an "integral part" of the United States.
The dissent written by Justice John Marshall Harlan held that the U.S. Congress was always bound to enact laws within the jurisdiction of the Constitution. In it, he said, "This nation is under the control of a written constitution, the supreme law of the land and the only source of the powers which our government, or any branch or officer of it, may exert at any time or at any place." He held that the Congress had no existence, and therefore had no authority, outside of the U.S. Constitution. He also said, "... two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument. By exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to a radical and mischievous change in our system of government will result ... We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism ... It will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of a government outside the supreme law of the land finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence."

[edit] Consequences

The idea of territorial incorporation is generally agreed to have arisen from Justice White's concurring decision noted above. Note that incorporation in this case does not refer to the legal process whereby a company takes on certain of the characteristics of a person (for which, see incorporation). The concept of territorial incorporation is that the United States can be proprietor of a territory without having actually incorporated the territory into the United States. These unincorporated territories are not due the full benefits of the U.S. Constitution, as noted from Justice White's decision above.
This idea has been used in court cases ever since in affirming that the citizens of certain territories can be subject to laws and regulations that are not Constitutionally applicable to other citizens of the United States. Many citizens of territories that have been designated unincorporated have seen the principle of territorial incorporation as a form of oppression (see, for example, Román, Ediberto, "The Alien-Citizen Paradox and Other Consequences of U.S. Colonialism", Florida State University Law Review, 1998).

http://www.republicofiowa.org/plan.html

Restored America – Our Plan

The plan is a bold achievable strategy for behind-the-scenes peaceful reconstruction of the de jure institutions of government

without controversy, violence or civil war. After a national vote and approval by the body of Republic Assemblies, the plan is

now in the implementation phase to accomplish the following:

